Littleton drivers will soon enter a national debate: Do cameras at red lights work? And are they worth it? The city’s police department says they …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
If you made a voluntary contribution in 2022-2023 of $50 or more, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access includes access to all websites and online content.
Littleton drivers will soon enter a national debate: Do cameras
at red lights work? And are they worth it?
The city’s police department says they are, which is why crews
have begun installing red-light camera enforcement at the
intersection of Littleton Boulevard and South Broadway.
The technology will also be installed at Santa Fe Drive and
Mineral Avenue, and Santa Fe Drive and Bowles. Littleton is
contracting with American Traffic Solutions Inc.
The three intersections have historically averaged 30 to 40
accidents each year, according to Littleton Police.
Littleton is installing cameras to photograph and ticket drivers
who run red lights. Some other Colorado cities have the technology,
including Denver, Lone Tree and Greenwood Village.
“Improving safety is our priority, and this red-light camera
program will help us reduce violations, crashes, and injuries
caused by red-light violators,” said Littleton Police Chief Heather
“This safety program will save lives, help the traffic flow in a
more orderly way, and make Littleton roadways safer by reducing the
number of red-light violations at no additional cost to
But the red-light camera program is not without controversy.
Some say the technology leads to an increase in rear-end
collisions. Others, including Littleton Mayor Doug Clark, say it is
nothing more than a money generator for cities.
During a Jan. 20 Littleton City Council meeting, Clark said he
thought the program was “close to being purely revenue driven.”
Coogan told city councilmembers at the same meeting that the
purpose of the technology was to “not have personnel tied up with
traffic accidents in these major intersections leaving the police
available to handle their number one priority — to handle calls for
In the past, photo enforcement programs have been seen as a
traffic safety support system for areas difficult for the police
department to manage effectively, said Bill Kroske, vice president
of business development for American Traffic Solutions.
“That is still the case for the most part: monitoring
intersections, school zones and road ways that are difficult for an
officer to cover, or areas where the camera system is more
efficient,” he said.
But of late, camera technology is taking on a greater roll,
according to Kroske.
“Most U.S. cities are suffering serious budget problems causing
cutbacks, hiring freezes, and restricted overtime in departments
across the board,” he said. “This problem can be particularly
problematic for the police departments in these times as the
demands on PD services grow. Domestic violence, minor and serious
crimes increase when times are economically tight.”
State law caps tickets for violators caught by cameras at $75,
and it doesn't allow points against a driver's license for those
In Littleton, violations recorded by camera will be forwarded to
a police officer, who will then evaluate the evidence. If the
officer confirms that the captured images indeed show a violation,
a summons will be issued to the registered owner of the
The owner can choose to pay for the violation by mail (there are
no points assessed against a person’s driver’s license for
red-light camera violations), or contest the issue in Littleton
The owner will be provided with the captured images of the
violation at the time the summons is issued.
While proponents say the cameras cut down on dangerous,
sometimes fatal, broadside collisions, opponents see them as
technology to increase government revenue while actually increasing
According to a media report by the Federal Highway
Administration, some cities have seen an increase in rear-end
accidents because of traffic cameras.
“Because drivers frequently slam on the brakes when they fear a
ticket, rear-end collisions increased by 15 percent, and the number
of injuries they caused rose 24 percent,” according to a Federal
Highway Administration study of seven cities.
“It is easy to try to find negatives to these programs —
rear-end accidents or money grab for the city — but in fact there
are 10 to 1 studies and reports that support that these programs
lead to a dramatic drop in serious collisions,” Kroske said.
In their first year Greenwood Village had a 30 percent drop in
accidents at one intersection, and 40 percent at their second site,
Another controversy surrounding traffic cameras is whether they
generate unnecessary government revenue.
“There were 78 right-turn violations and no accidents and we put
in a system that costs $6,000 per month and there is voluntary
compliance — how is it anything more than revenue generation?”
Clark said at the Jan. 20 council meeting.
City Manger Jim Woods said the program was not intended to be
An ordinance pertaining to the red-light enforcement will come
before council for a second reading July 7. The system will go into
effect 30 days after a trial run, provided council passes the
Other items that may interest you
We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.
The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.